Attention Wall Street: Democrats are seeking higher taxes on capital gains

This post was originally published on this site

John Delaney understands investing. Before entering politics, he made a fortune by founding finance companies that raised $20 billion in capital for businesses.

Which lends extra credibility to one proposal in Delaney’s long-shot 2020 presidential campaign. He wants to raise the 20 percent top tax rate on long-term capital gains, saying investors no longer need the enticement of a lower rate on profits than on ordinary income.

“It’s hard to make an argument that we have a shortage of investment capital,” says Delaney, a Democratic former House member from Maryland. “The notion that we need a lower capital gains rate in general to get people to invest is not accurate.”

His idea sends Wall Street a bracing signal of what 2021 might bring. Not only do Democrats want to raise taxes on the wealthy, but an increasing number find taxes on investment profits the most appealing target.

Higher capital gains and estate taxes “are more consistent with a story about work versus wealth, so therefore more attractive from a thematic point of view,” reasoned Jake Sullivan, who coordinated policy for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign.

“Things like the millionaires surtax we proposed in 2016 now feel kind of boring,” Sullivan added. “It’s not that raising income taxes on millionaires isn’t politically saleable, it’s just not as compelling as taxing returns to wealth.”

The growing blue-collar tilt of the Trump-era GOP base makes the target even more tempting. Though business-friendly GOP congressional leaders resist all tax hikes, rank-and-file Republicans back capital gains increases more than other kinds, said Democratic pollster Geoff Garin.

The top rate on capital gains last matched the top rate on labor income after the bipartisan 1986 tax reform signed by President Ronald Reagan. It set both at 28 percent.

Subsequently, the rate on capital gains edged down, while the rate on income edged up. Estate taxes have fluctuated in rates and the size of estates subject to tax.

The 2017 tax cut signed by President Donald Trump reduced the top rate on income to 37 percent from 39.6 percent, but left the top capital gains rate unchanged; for both, the highest earners face the additional 3.8 percent tax enacted to help finance Obamacare. The estate tax remained at 40 percent, but the law reduced the number of taxable estates by doubling exempted amounts to $11 million for individuals and $22 million for married couples.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a fiery first-term New Yorker in the new House Democratic majority, seized headlines by suggesting a 70 percent top rate on the highest incomes. But the party’s presidential candidates have different ideas.

To finance his spending plans, Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont has proposed raising the top personal and capital gains rates to 54 percent – a much higher increase in the latter. He would lift the top estate tax rate to 65 percent.

When Sen. Kamala Harris of California called for big federal investments in teacher salaries this week, she identified higher estate taxes as her financing source. When Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts proposed expanded affordable housing and universal child care, she tapped estate taxes and a new “Ultra-Millionaire Tax.”

By levying 2 percent each year on assets of families worth more than $50 million, and another 1 percent for those worth more than $1 billion, Warren would tax capital gains as they occur without waiting for assets to be sold, as current law does. By preserving the existing capital gains tax, she would tax gains both ways.

Delaney considers her “wealth tax” vulnerable to constitutional challenge as confiscation of property. His plan to equalize income and capital-gains rates – with exceptions such as investments in economically distressed “opportunity zones” – faces a different sort of opposition.

Some Democratic economists equalization would increase the “lock-in” effects that deter asset sales. Fewer assets sold means fewer realized profits to tax.

“Pushing the rate up past 30 percent is estimated to cost the government revenue, so what is the point?” asked Larry Summers, a top advisor to Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. Another former Obama economist, Betsey Stevenson, suggests eliminating the “step-up” basis for inherited assets that now allows vast amounts of capital gains to escape taxation permanently.

There’s also intra-party political disagreement. Clinton’s 2016 pollster Joel Benenson still prefers income tax hikes on the wealthiest Americans as “easiest to understand because everyone pays income tax.”

Yet his veteran counterpart Stan Greenberg notes that ordinary families pay their own wealth levies through local property taxes. Greenberg envisions a simple, potent question for voters: “Why is profit taxed less than earned income?”

Add Comment